Monday, November 23, 2009



ASSIGNMENT 3: Observation in Nature




Saturday 21 November 2009



Course work: Started exploring the properties of my various colored media, working in my course sketchbook.



My first experiments utilized Derwent Coloursoft Pencils. I started off working in a 5 cm square, but quickly learned that I needed more space. I also learned that, surprisingly, slight dampening produces an effect quite similar to watercolor pencils. I sketched an orange, and worked at shading it, not very convincingly…it appears that sketchbook paper quickly takes up a maximum amount of pigment, and that adding more doesn’t produce very satisfactory blending. A tiny stylized tree was half-moistened, and half left dry, confirming that water does produce some blending and color intensification. An application of yellow over blue produced a green, but not a very strong green. Vertical stripes of yellow, orange, red, purple, and green were crossed with horizontal stripes of the same colors to assess opacity and miscibility: yellow, orange, and to a lesser extent red pick up significant amount of the underlying color. None of the colors is opaque enough to fully conceal the underlying different color. Color blending with a finger is not successful; rubbing with a paper stump produces a somewhat better effect.



A second series of experiments was carried out with Prismacolor colored markers. I have only the three primary and three secondary colors in these. The colors are very intense. Since these markers are solvent-based, they are water-resistant once applied. Application of one color over another does not yield very strong mixing; yellow over blue produces only a weak green. Mixing complements produces fairly strong neutrals (particularly strong with orange and blue). Use of a colorless blender results in some color mixture, but also lightens the underlying color, and produces a strong “bloom”. The back of the sketchbook page is worthless for further use, and at least two sheets of paper are needed beneath the “working” page in order to prevent marring of subsequent pages of the sketchbook with bleed-through. I understand that special paper is available for use with markers that minimizes some of these problems, but I don’t see these markers as being very useful to me: I’m glad I only bought a few to try.




Total time: 47 minutes
Monday 23 November 2009




Course work: After reviewing yesterday’s work on the final drawing in Assignment Two, I concluded that it would be a stronger composition left unfinished. I did a little more work on it, applied some workable fixative, and photographed it for submission. I’ll move on to further work on Assignment 3 now.


Sunday 22 November 2009




Course work: Three small heads of people seen in town. I think it is time to declare the “Moving Figure” exercise complete, while planning to continue similar work until I can do it adequately. Two sketchbook pages of ideas and details for the final drawing in Assignment Two. Tried graphite pencil, carbon pencil, Conte’ crayon, water-soluble pencil, and charcoal: decided on the latter, since use of tone is the major objective of this drawing. On this grey, rainy day, I used artificial lighting, which brought out the folds in the model’s clothing very nicely. After some thought, I decided that omitting the feet, and legs below mid-tibia, would improve the composition. The drawing moved along fairly well, and I’d estimate I’m about 2/3 done.






Reading:



Cathy Johnson The Sierra Club Guide to Sketching in Nature

Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, 1990

Pp 31-66



Ian Simpson, The Complete Drawing Course

Running Press, Philadelphia, PA 1993

Lesson 15 (pp 122-127)





Personal Sketchbook work: A sketch of part of the nighttime view from my armchair.




Summary Observations on the Moving Figure Exercise (Check and Log):

This was perhaps my most difficult exercise to date, and I don’t really think I’ve done it justice: I will continue to work on the moving figure in the future. In a few cases, I managed to capture the “gesture” of the moment; most of the little sketches I’ve done are fragments. The visual memory I’ve always prided myself for doesn’t seem to have done much for me here. I continue to seek the “…few descriptive lines to suggest the movement…”.



Weekly thoughts on learning experience: Portraiture and figure work still seem to be very challenging, but I have made a great deal of progress over the past several weeks. I still lack the ability to capture a truly convincing likeness, but it may take more years than I have left to achieve this.





Total time: About three hours (95)
Saturday 21 November 2009




Course work: As my model was unavailable today, I could not do any work on the last part of Assignment Two. I therefore started work on the first part of Assignment 3, and have reported it under that heading.

Reading:



Jim Arnosky Drawing From Nature

Lothrop, Lee, and Shepard Books, New York, 1987

(A short book with un-numbered pages, more illustrations than text. Contains information that will be helpful in Assignment 3.)



Cathy Johnson The Sierra Club Guide to Sketching in Nature

Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, 1990

Pp xi-xii, 1-30



Personal Sketchbook work: In my pocket sketchbook, three pecans, one still with some husk, found under a “feral” tree probably planted by a squirrel hiding a nut.




Total time: A bit over an hour (92)
Friday 20 November 2009




Course work: Completed the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2. Trying to decide what to leave out of this pure line drawing was as difficult as deciding what to put in. I think I did a reasonable job of capturing the pose of a somewhat drowsy model trying to keep her mind on her book and on maintaining the pose.




Reading:



Deborah Haynes Art Lessons

Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2003

Pp 17-50



Personal Sketchbook work: Two reproduction oil lamps, one mid-Eastern, one Roman.




Total time: About 1 ½ hours
Friday 13 November 2009




Felt unwell; did nothing useful today.



Saturday 14 November 2009



Course work: Did three little sketches of people seen on the street in Washington, Georgia. I am not pleased with my progress on this “Moving Figure” exercise. Did a third self-portrait, charcoal with touches of white pastel on buff paper 22 x 28 cm (8 ½ x 11”). Although I am not entirely happy with this piece, I think that I have, overall, now done a reasonable job of fulfilling the objectives of the “Self Portrait” exercise.



Reading:



David Bayles and Ted Orland Art and Fear

Image Continuum Press, Santa Cruz, Californian, USA, 1993

Pp 93-118

(The subtitle, “Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking”, describes this book rather well. This is not a book of “how,” but a book of “why.” I’ve read it before, undelined in it extensively, expect to read it again, and have recommended it to friends who are having difficulty finding their way. A worthwhile book.)



Tom Coates Creating a Self Portrait

Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 1989

Pp 7-129

(This would have been a more useful book had it been twice as long. The author does well at getting so much between the covers, but one wishes for so much more. I wish that this book had resurfaced two weeks ago: I might have approached the self-portrait exercise somewhat differently.)



Personal Sketchbook work: A sketch of part of the book-case in my office-studio.



Summary Observations on the Self Portrait Exercise (Check and Log): Many years of seeing myself in a mirror and in photographs did not prepare me well for this exercise: my early attempts were very poor indeed, but I improved gradually as time passed. I plan to do more self portraits in the future. I think that I can see the head and neck as basic shapes, and the head and face appear solid and convincing in at least some of my drawings. Asymmetry is present primarily in my age wrinkles, eyelids, and the different appearance of my ears. I think the shadows are adequately placed. Head size had to be readjusted often as drawing progressed. This was a good exercise: I learned a lot from it.



Total time: About 2 ½ hours



Sunday 15 November 2009



Today was almost entirely consumed by a trip to Atlanta, Georgia to see the da Vinci exhibit at the High Museum (report in museum and gallery visits section).



Monday 16 November 2009



Course work: I found the instructions for the “Portrait from memory” section confusing and contradictory. One can hardly “…repeat the sketches until you feel you have gained enough information…” if one is to “…draw someone you have seen momentarily…” I chose to approach the exercise by spending twenty minutes collecting information from three photographs I have in which an individual I see primarily at local social events happens to be included. I then put the photographs away and worked from my notes, sketches, and memory. The process was, as expected, difficult: perhaps the most difficult part was getting a reasonable approximation of the unusually-shaped skull, which in a lateral view is quite strongly dolichocephalic. This, the subject’s chronic squint, and his complete baldness, are the three most important features in obtaining a likeness here. I found trying to imagine shading challenging, and finally omitted most of it.





Reading:



(No author listed) Techniques of the Great Masters of Art

Quantum Books, Ltd., London 1985

(Enjoyed browsing in this book for some time)



Personal Sketchbook work: A sketch of several foil-wrapped chocolate candies




Summary Observations on the Portrait from Memory Exercise (Check and Log):

This is a difficult exercise: one learns that memory is frail indeed. Converting my sketches to a portrait was a challenge, especially considering the paucity of my original reference material. If I were to do a similar exercise (with clearer instructions) in the future, I would certainly endeavor to collect more information and draw more initial sketches.



Total time: About three hours



Tuesday 17 November 2009



Course work: Drew two quick sketches of people walking in town, both very unsatisfactory. Started work on the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2: tested several slightly different seated poses, did a number of small sketches, and provisionally selected a pose to begin work on tomorrow.





Reading:



Rudy De Reyna How to Draw What You See

Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 1972

Pp 69-102



E.H. Gombrich, The Story of Art,

Phaidon Press Limited, Oxford 1978

Chapter 19 (pp 301-324)













Personal Sketchbook work: A manikin drawing in the pose I have selected for my first assessment drawing.




Other activities: My painting group met today (time not included)



Total time: About two hours



Wednesday 18 November 2009



Course work: Got much of the pencil block-in done for the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2. I hope to be able to start inking in tomorrow.



Reading:



Russell Hart Photographing Your Artwork

Amherst Media, Inc., Buffalo, New York, USA. 2000

Pp 12-57

(This book, though only nine years old, is essentially obsolete, as it deals only with film cameras. Some of the information in the first half of the book, which is all I read, remains pertinent.)



Personal Sketchbook work: A drawing of a leek.




Total time: About 1 ½ hours (87 ½)



Thursday 19 November 2009



Course work: A sketchbook page of figures in motion or at rest in the parking lot of the grocery store. A bit more work on the pencil block-in for the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2, and the first few ink lines.




Reading:



James Horton Composition and Perspective

Quintet Publishing Ltd, London, 1994

Pp 4-64

(This small and slender volume could well be a transcript of a single lecture on the subject. I thought it rather basic, but a good review of the high points.)



Deborah Haynes Art Lessons

Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2003

Pp ix-xvii, 1-16



Personal Sketchbook work: Some further experimentation with powdered graphite, this time a drapery study. As noted on 12 November, workable fixative and repeated applications of the powdered graphite are required, but the result is acceptable. I think I’ll try in on paper with more “tooth” next time. Also did a little sketch of three pears, using water-soluble pencil. This completes the first “personal” sketchbook (in which I primarily do work not directly related to the course). My pocket sketchbook work is much less impressive in volume.





Total time: About two hours (89 ½)



Comment: I am now three months into the drawing course. I can tell that my work is more confident, and that I can produce equivalent work in a good bit less time than formerly. My interest level remains high. I am about two weeks behind my originally-planned schedule, in part because of my mother’s illness, and in part because of additional effort required on some of the figure exercises, but have done almost 200 hours of work (actual drawing and reading) through today. House guests next week will set me further behind my plan, but I confidently expect to finish Assignment 2 before the end of next week.

Friday, November 20, 2009

Friday 13 November 2009




Felt unwell; did nothing useful today.



Saturday 14 November 2009



Course work: Did three little sketches of people seen on the street in Washington, Georgia. I am not pleased with my progress on this “Moving Figure” exercise. Did a third self-portrait, charcoal with touches of white pastel on buff paper 22 x 28 cm (8 ½ x 11”). Although I am not entirely happy with this piece, I think that I have, overall, now done a reasonable job of fulfilling the objectives of the “Self Portrait” exercise.



Reading:



David Bayles and Ted Orland Art and Fear

Image Continuum Press, Santa Cruz, Californian, USA, 1993

Pp 93-118

(The subtitle, “Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking”, describes this book rather well. This is not a book of “how,” but a book of “why.” I’ve read it before, undelined in it extensively, expect to read it again, and have recommended it to friends who are having difficulty finding their way. A worthwhile book.)



Tom Coates Creating a Self Portrait

Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 1989

Pp 7-129

(This would have been a more useful book had it been twice as long. The author does well at getting so much between the covers, but one wishes for so much more. I wish that this book had resurfaced two weeks ago: I might have approached the self-portrait exercise somewhat differently.)



Personal Sketchbook work: A sketch of part of the book-case in my office-studio.



Summary Observations on the Self Portrait Exercise (Check and Log): Many years of seeing myself in a mirror and in photographs did not prepare me well for this exercise: my early attempts were very poor indeed, but I improved gradually as time passed. I plan to do more self portraits in the future. I think that I can see the head and neck as basic shapes, and the head and face appear solid and convincing in at least some of my drawings. Asymmetry is present primarily in my age wrinkles, eyelids, and the different appearance of my ears. I think the shadows are adequately placed. Head size had to be readjusted often as drawing progressed. This was a good exercise: I learned a lot from it.



Total time: About 2 ½ hours



Sunday 15 November 2009



Today was almost entirely consumed by a trip to Atlanta, Georgia to see the da Vinci exhibit at the High Museum (report in museum and gallery visits section).



Monday 16 November 2009



Course work: I found the instructions for the “Portrait from memory” section confusing and contradictory. One can hardly “…repeat the sketches until you feel you have gained enough information…” if one is to “…draw someone you have seen momentarily…” I chose to approach the exercise by spending twenty minutes collecting information from three photographs I have in which an individual I see primarily at local social events happens to be included. I then put the photographs away and worked from my notes, sketches, and memory. The process was, as expected, difficult: perhaps the most difficult part was getting a reasonable approximation of the unusually-shaped skull, which in a lateral view is quite strongly dolichocephalic. This, the subject’s chronic squint, and his complete baldness, are the three most important features in obtaining a likeness here. I found trying to imagine shading challenging, and finally omitted most of it.



Reading:



(No author listed) Techniques of the Great Masters of Art

Quantum Books, Ltd., London 1985

(Enjoyed browsing in this book for some time)



Personal Sketchbook work: A sketch of several foil-wrapped chocolate candies



Summary Observations on the Portrait from Memory Exercise (Check and Log):

This is a difficult exercise: one learns that memory is frail indeed. Converting my sketches to a portrait was a challenge, especially considering the paucity of my original reference material. If I were to do a similar exercise (with clearer instructions) in the future, I would certainly endeavor to collect more information and draw more initial sketches.



Total time: About three hours



Tuesday 17 November 2009



Course work: Drew two quick sketches of people walking in town, both very unsatisfactory. Started work on the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2: tested several slightly different seated poses, did a number of small sketches, and provisionally selected a pose to begin work on tomorrow.



Reading:



Rudy De Reyna How to Draw What You See

Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, 1972

Pp 69-102



E.H. Gombrich, The Story of Art,

Phaidon Press Limited, Oxford 1978

Chapter 19 (pp 301-324)













Personal Sketchbook work: A manikin drawing in the pose I have selected for my first assessment drawing.



Other activities: My painting group met today (time not included)



Total time: About two hours



Wednesday 18 November 2009



Course work: Got much of the pencil block-in done for the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2. I hope to be able to start inking in tomorrow.



Reading:



Russell Hart Photographing Your Artwork

Amherst Media, Inc., Buffalo, New York, USA. 2000

Pp 12-57

(This book, though only nine years old, is essentially obsolete, as it deals only with film cameras. Some of the information in the first half of the book, which is all I read, remains pertinent.)



Personal Sketchbook work: A drawing of a leek.



Total time: About 1 ½ hours (87 ½)



Thursday 19 November 2009



Course work: A sketchbook page of figures in motion or at rest in the parking lot of the grocery store. A bit more work on the pencil block-in for the first assessment drawing for Assignment 2, and the first few ink lines.



Reading:



James Horton Composition and Perspective

Quintet Publishing Ltd, London, 1994

Pp 4-64

(This small and slender volume could well be a transcript of a single lecture on the subject. I thought it rather basic, but a good review of the high points.)



Deborah Haynes Art Lessons

Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 2003

Pp ix-xvii, 1-16



Personal Sketchbook work: Some further experimentation with powdered graphite, this time a drapery study. As noted on 12 November, workable fixative and repeated applications of the powdered graphite are required, but the result is acceptable. I think I’ll try in on paper with more “tooth” next time. Also did a little sketch of three pears, using water-soluble pencil. This completes the first “personal” sketchbook (in which I primarily do work not directly related to the course). My pocket sketchbook work is much less impressive in volume.



Total time: About two hours (89 ½)



Comment: I am now three months into the drawing course. I can tell that my work is more confident, and that I can produce equivalent work in a good bit less time than formerly. My interest level remains high. I am about two weeks behind my originally-planned schedule, in part because of my mother’s illness, and in part because of additional effort required on some of the figure exercises, but have done almost 200 hours of work (actual drawing and reading) through today. House guests next week will set me further behind my plan, but I confidently expect to finish Assignment 2 before the end of the month.